N10m Bribe: Why I Implicated CCT Chair Danladi Umar – Witness Tells Court
Mr. Ali Gambo Abdullahi, former Personal Assistant to the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) Chairman, told an Abuja High Court on Tuesday that Mr. Danladi Yakubu Umar, the CCT chairman, met severally in his chamber with an accused person, Mr. Rasheed Taiwo Owolabi, a retired Deputy Comptroller-General of the Nigeria Customs Service, who was standing trial before him on false assets declaration charges.
Abdullahi told the court while giving evidence in the trial within trial on the disputed statement he made to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in respect of N10 million bribe allegedly demanded by the CCT Chairman from the accused person in order to strike out the charges against him.
The witness, who was cross-examined by Mr. Andrew Akoja, the EFCC Counsel, told Justice Chizobia Oji that it was at the end of the last meeting of the accused person with the CCT Chairman that a sum of N1.8 million was paid into his own personal account by the ex-Customs chief.
However, contrary to his statement made on August 12, 2013 that the N1.8 million was part of the N10 million bribe meant for the CCT Chairman, the witness said that the money was deposited into his Zenith Bank account by the accused person to offset the medical bill of his ailing father.
The witness further told the court that he never met with the former Deputy Comptroller-General of the Customs until he started visiting the CCT Chairman in the course of his trial and that the money was paid to him immediately after the last visit to the CCT boss.
Confronted with the statement where he implicated the CCT Chairman on the N10 million bribery saga, Abdullahi said that the statement he first made on the issue was made under duress and based on inducement promised him by two operatives of the EFCC, Abdulmajeed Ibrahim and Bala Mohammed, who investigated the petition of the ex-Customs man in the matter.
In further cross-examination by the EFCC counsel, the witness who read out some portions of the statement identified his signature and admitted that he signed the statement and that he also signed an attestation confirming that his statement was made freely and voluntarily by him.
Earlier in his evidence-in-chief, Abdullahi had told the court that he was a protocol officer at the CCT when he was employed in 2009 and that he later became the Personal Assistant to the Chairman.
He told the court that he got to know the former Customs officer during his numerous visits to his boss and that in the last visit, the said Taiwo met him with sympathisers on the plight of his father and that it was as a result of the plight of his father that prompted the payment of N1.8 million to cater for his father.
The witness said that on August 12, 2013, he was invited into EFCC office in Abuja where he was confronted with a petition from the said Rasheed Owolabi Taiwo on the alleged N10 million bribery deal and that he made a statement on the same day and was allowed to go home on administrative bail but with a condition – to be visiting EFCC twice a week pending the completion of investigation.
He also informed the court that the following day, two Directors from CCT followed him to the EFCC to perfect his bail condition and that in the course of his several visits to the EFCC, he made several statements in addition to that of August 12, 2013.
The witness said that the additional statements where he exonerated the CCT Chairman was the true reflection of what transpired on the N10 million bribe and not his first statement of August 12, where he implicated the CCT boss as the beneficiary of the N1.8 million bribe.
He denied that his other statements where he exonerated the CCT boss were after-thoughts, adding that he was made to implicate his boss under duress and promises of inducements.
Meanwhile, Justice Chizobia Oji, the trial judge, has adjourned adoption of addresses in the matter till October 20, 2016.
It would be recalled that the witness had been arraigned before the court on charges of giving false information but his denial of his first statement on the bribery issue prompted the trial within trial by Justice Oji to determine his claim of duress before admitting the statement in evidence as exhibit.