Half Of Nigeria’s Revenue From Oil Spent On NNPC Operations, Unbudgeted Subsidies – #NNPCAudit
- report shows that 46 per cent of proceeds of domestic crude oil revenues for the review period was spent on NNPC’s operations and subsidies.
- NNPC Spent N3.65 Trillion ($22 Billion) Without Approval
By George Agba, NSE Anthony-Uko
The report of the forensic audit of the accounts of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) released yesterday showed that the Corporation spent no less than N$18.53billion (or N3.65 trillion) as operational costs without a duly approved budgetary allocation.
The forensic audit report conducted by , showed that the total gross revenues generated from the federal government crude oil liftings between January 1, 2012 and July 31, 2013 was $69.34 billion and not $67 billion as earlier stated by the federal government’s Reconciliation Committee.
Out of this, total cash remitted into the Federation Accounts in relation to crude oil liftings was $50.81 billion and not $47billion as earlier stated by the Reconciliation Committee for the period from January 2012 to July 2013.
PwC was engaged the office of the auditor-general for the federation (AuGF) to investigate any and all crude oil revenues generated by the NNPC that was withheld or unremitted to the Federation Accounts between 1 January 2012 and 31 July 2013.
The auditing firm also indicted the NNPC of lack of transparency and recommended full disclosures of third-party liabilities.
“The analysis above and resulting potential excess remittance suggest the existence of liabilities to third parties incurred by the Corporation. We recommend the Corporation be required to disclose details of all existing liabilities and impact on proceeds of future crude oil sales.”
As indicated by the report, the NNPC drew monies directly from revenues generated from crude oil liftings to fund its operations directly rather than remit same into the Federation Accounts for disbursement and allocation.
The report shows that 46 per cent of proceeds of domestic crude oil revenues for the review period was spent on NNPC’s operations and subsidies.
The auditing firm also faulted the NNPC’s current model of operations, describing it as unsustainable due to the resulting potential excess remittance. The auditing firm stressed that with the drop in oil price, the NNPC would be unable to make any remittance into the Federation Accounts if the current model was not changed.
“The Corporation is unable to sustain monthly remittances to the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) and also meet its operational costs entirely from the proceeds of domestic crude oil revenues, and has had to incur third party liabilities to bridge the funding gap.
“Furthermore, the review period recorded international crude oil prices averaging $122.5 per barrel. By the time of concluding this report, international crude oil prices average about $46.07 per barrel, which is about 62 per cent reduction when compared to the crude oil prices for the review period. If the NNPC overhead costs and subsidies are maintained (assuming crude oil production volumes are maintained), the Corporation may have to exhaust all the proceeds of domestic crude oil sales, and may still require third party liabilities to meet costs of operations and subsidies, and may not be able to make any remittances to FAAC.
The NNPC said it incurred a cost of $12.23 billion, paid $8.70 billion for verified Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) and DPK (kerosene) subsidy, despite the absence of a properly defined framework for kerosene subsidy during the period.
Other costs incurred by the Corporation included demurrage claims by counterparties on product-exchange arrangements, $0.14 billion; verified crude oil and product losses, $0.83 billion; verified pipeline maintenance and management costs, $0.49 billion.
However, the report showed that the NNPC also incurred costs of $2.81 billion not directly attributable to domestic crude.
The resulting potential excess remittance indicates that the Corporation operates an unsustainable model.
PwC, in the report, also said it was unable to ascertain the exact unremitted revenues accruing to the Federation Accounts as it did not have access to NPDC’s full account. The Nigerian Petroleum Development Company is a subsidiary of the NNPC.
“We did not have access to NPDC’s full accounts and records and we have not ascertained the amount of costs and expenses which should be applied to the US$5.11billion Crude Oil revenue (net of royalties and PPT paid) per the NPDC submission to the Senate Committee which should be considered as dividend payment by NPDC to NNPC for ultimate remittance to the Federation Account.”
“Between 12 January and 29 January 2015, NNPC provided transaction documents representing additional costs of $2.81 billion related to the review period, citing the NNPC Act LFN No 33 of 1977 that allows such deductions. Clarity is required on whether such deductions should be made by NNPC as a first-line charge before remitting the net proceeds of domestic crude to the Federation Accounts. If these are deemed not to be valid deductions, then the amount due from NNPC would be estimated at $2.07 billion (without considering expected known remittances from NPDC) or $4.29 billion (if expected known remittances from NPDC are considered).”
The forensic audit became necessary following a letter in September 2013 by the former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, to President Goodluck Jonathan stating that from January 2012 to July 2013, NNPC lifted $65 billion worth of crude on behalf of the federal government but remitted only $15.2 billion into the Federation Accounts, with $49.8 billion as outstanding to the federal government.