$9.3m Scandal: South Africa Insists On Criminal Investigation, Confiscates Cash
The South African National Prosecuting Authority has insisted on a criminal probe of the $9.m found in a private jet in South Africa, thereby casting a shdow over the efforts of the Nigerian government to ensure amicable settlement of issues surrounding money.
There were reports on Wednesday that $9.3m, which was seized from two Nigerians and an Israeli in Johannesburg, was meant for procurement of arms for intelligence agencies in Nigeria.
The jet bearing the money, Bombardier Challenger 6000, was said to belong to the President of the Christian Association of Nigeria, Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor.
It was also reported that the Federal Government was aware of the move to procure arms.
The Federal Government was said to have begun diplomatic talks with South Africa to ensure resolution of the issue.
But South Africa’s NPA’s spokesman, Nathi Mncube, in a response to an enquiry, said, “The matter is under criminal investigations by the Directorate of Priority Crimes of Investigations unit at South African Police Services.
“NPA does not comment on pending investigations and therefore cannot comment any other than providing the information contained in our media statement.”
The NPA, in a statement on Thursday, said that its asset forfeiture unit had obtained “an order in the North Gauteng High Court freezing a cash amount of US$9.34m (about R102m).”
According to the agency, the money is currently kept safe by the South African Reserve Bank
Giving an insight into the seizure, it said, “The cash consisted of 90 blocks of $100, 000 each and was found in two black plastic suitcases.”
The NPA stated that the order freezing the money was granted in terms of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act which “provides that property that is used to commit a crime can be frozen while the NPA applies for a final order to forfeit the money to the state.”
It stated that the money was initially detained by the South African Revenue Service as it was not disclosed or declared at customs, and was above the prescribed legal limit for the amount of cash that could be brought into the country.
According to the statement, the NPA also submitted to the court that, although various explanations about the money were given to the investigating officer, these explanations were riddled with discrepancies.
Do not hesitate to leave your opinion in the comment section below.
To contact Abusidiqu.com for Article Submission and Advertisement or General inquiry, send a mail to email@example.com